I realize that it’s been an entire week since SQLSaturday 35 in Dallas and that’s an eternity in the blogosphere, but I’ve been recently reminded of a very painful lesson: you pay for taking days off.  Two days out of the office to go to Dallas cost me much more than two days worth of work; I’m not sure what temporal and spatial laws are in effect that cause this, but it’s damned annoying.  It’s not making me look forward to next week, when I’m taking the entire week off; I should be behind for the rest of the month.

Anyway, the trip to Dallas was especially great for me; I grew up in Northeast Louisiana, and many of my friends moved to the Dallas area after college.  Unfortunately, I was only able to catch up with two of them (Evan R. and Brad W.); they graciously allowed me to use their couches, saving me a lot of coin for what was essentially an unpaid employee training expense.  It was great catching up with them, and I hope to be back that way in the near future.

This particular SQLSaturday was also very cool because it’s the first one that I attended simply as an attendee and NOT as a speaker; this was eye-opening for me, because it gave me a chance to experience some things as an outsider (although I did crash the speaker’s dinner on Friday night), and that gave me a chance to reflect on what it’s like to not know all of the details about an event, and what can be done to make sure people know what’s going on when, where, and how.  I’ll get to that in a second, but let me throw some thoughts out there.

What Worked Well…

I don’t think anyone can say enough about the team of volunteers from the North Texas SQL Server User Group; these guys simply ROCK, and they pulled without a hitch.  I especially liked the fact that they spread out the work effort over several volunteers, and that every member of the team took their responsibility seriously.   In my mind, however, there were a couple of amazing contributions at this particular event that often get overlooked, so I want to give a quick acknowledgement to them:

1. Having a designated photographer was a great idea.  Everywhere I looked, there was a volunteer taking snaps.  I’m not sure where those pictures will be posted, but we’ve had volunteers in the past take some great photos, but never really treated them as a full-time member of the team. I think having someone designated to capture the memory of the event is a great idea, particularly if it can be folded into networking opportunities later.
2. The food and food distribution was amazing; whoever picked the caterers did a great job, and the way it was laid out was simply wonderful.  Although I loved the ice cream at the end of the day, the sugar rush (and subsequent crash) was a bit tough for me personally.  Great idea, but unexpected side effects; I slept through most of the last session 🙂
3. Finally, Ryan Adams was the sponsor coordinator, and I watched him work those tables several times throughout the day.  That was a nice touch, and I hope the sponsors appreciated having someone who was available to them all the time to handle any issues that they may have had come up.

Others have noted how great the facility was; I couldn’t agree more.  I’m hoping that we can find a similar venue for our next SQLSaturday in Atlanta.  Registration worked great; I think having an early morning raffle incentive helped keep the distribution of the attendees relatively constant, and they had several lines available for people to check in.   I did feel a bit of “what happens now” after I made it through the line, but it was easy to spot where everyone was hanging out.

One thing that I really liked was the use of a claim ticket for filling out speaker evals; we had done something similar for the last Atlanta event, but the Dallas crew did it a little different.  Each attendee got a single ticket at the beginning of the day, and they used that same number throughout the day to fill out speaker evals.  Unlike us, however, they chose to do all of the drawings at the end of the day.

Finally, the event guide was amazing; it was very thorough and complete, and looked very professional.  All in all, I think the event was a wonderful day, and I hope people really appreciated how well things were handled.

What Didn’t Work So Well…

There were a couple of minor issues, however, and I mention them only so that other SQLSaturday coordinators can plan from them.  The brochure was wonderful, but the central schedule was organized around tracks, not times, which meant that if you were hopping tracks, you had to keep scanning in order to find the time something was occurring in order to see what classes were available.  This was a departure from the traditional scheduling format, and I just think it didn’t work as well as the planners hoped.  The planning team did have a great web tool for picking a schedule, and I noticed that many people were walking around with paper copies of those; those schedules were the traditional arrangement by time.

Second, and this was completely minor, I felt lost at the beginning of the day.  Again, this was the first event I’ve been to in a long time where I was simply an attendee, and it was a little overwhelming to go from the registration desk and walk into a mass of people milling about.  I’m not sure what can be done about that, but I’m wondering if introducing an usher would help make that transition slightly less disconcerting.

Third, the sponsors were responsible for providing their own tickets; this was both good and bad, so I need to follow up with sponsors about how they felt about it.  Waiting on people to fill out forms did create a traffic jam, but it completely took away some of the set-up responsibilities from the organizers.  The sponsors may also have benefitted from having people hanging out.

Finally (and this happens at every SQLSaturday I’ve been to), I don’t think enough mention was made of the fact that there is a thriving SQL Server community that meets every month behind every SQLSaturday.  We get so caught up on the day, that we forget to give enough shout-outs to the local or national PASS communities.  Tim Mitchell tried to do that at the end of the day, but it was done after the raffles were over and people were packing up to leave. 

These, of course, are minor quibbles; overall, it was a great day of training.  The classes I went to (for the most part) were excellent, and I felt like I came back with some new ideas to try out.

Plans For Future Events…

So here’s my final take-away, and what I plan to do at the next Atlanta SQLSaturday:

1. Punch up the mention of the local chapter and PASS a LOT.  Focus on getting people connected to those organizations.
2. Reward people for making connections; find some variant of Twitter Bingo to help people make local connections.
3. I loved the claim check idea with a single number for the whole day; I think we’re going to steal it, but continue to do raffles in-session and save the big prizes for the end of the day.
4. Contact the sponsors and ask them how they want to handle raffle tickets in the future.

Other Writeups….

A lot of other people have already written about their experiences at SQLSaturday 35′; in case you missed them, here’s some of the ones I read:

SQLAJ – What I gained from volunteering at SQLSat35

MidnightDBA (Jen) We Made This, Part 1 of 2 (Thoughts on SQL Saturday 35)

Made2Mentor: My SQL Saturday Experience

Ryan Adams: SQL Saturday Weekend Palooza

Bill Fellows: SQL Saturday 35 experience #sqlsat35

Wes Brown: SQL Saturday #35 Notes and Observations

So this wrap-up took a little longer for me to write than I had hoped; work had piled up a bit post-con, and finals were going on in the class I teach part-time at Gainesville State College.  Nonetheless, I’ve been thinking a lot about what happened at the third SQLSaturday for AtlantaMDF, and hopefully this list will help some of the other groups prepping for their event.  Before I get started however, you may want to review my life lessons from SQLSaturday 13 and 25.  Go ahead; I’ll wait.

Ready?  Before I go too much further, I should note that there have already been a lot of write-ups about the event from the speakers; I’ll try to build a list of them below my notes, but I will be borrowing liberally from some of them (particularly Jen McCown’s post at http://midnightdba.itbookworm.com/midnightdba/blog/post/A-MidnightDBA-in-Atlanta-(SQL-Saturday-41).aspx).  I’ll try to give credit where credit is due, but in case I overlook someone’s contribution, please feel free to point it out.

Pre-con preparation

Here’s a list of stuff that I could have managed a little better BEFORE the conference began.  Again, I don’t think we did anything bad; I just want to improve it for next year.

Committee Work.

This particular SQLSaturday was a new challenge for me; the previous two SQLSaturdays I had done most of the leg work before the conference by myself, and only really accepted volunteers to help on the actual day of the event.  That had pluses and minuses; the pluses were that I became very aware of some of the larger issues associated with putting the event on.  The minuses were that I was a raving lunatic for several weeks, including the day of the event.

This year, I tried to put together a committee, and there were some different challenges with that; there was a lot of energy among the members of the group, and that led us to do some things that I wouldn’t have normally tried (good thing), but it also meant that we spent a lot of time debating how to do things (not a bad thing; just something to account for in the future).  The biggest plus for me was delegation; the week of the event, I actually had a very small list of things to do, and that was wonderful.  Other people on the team really stepped up and took care of a lot of issues for me.

I definitely think working with a committee is much better than attempting to do it solo, but I would still recommend that you have a definite committee leader (someone with veto power).  If I were to do it all over again, I’d be much more strict about working with a punch list (more on that in a minute); we had a lot of ideas floating around, and unfortunately, most of them were in my own head.

Start legwork earlier.

I’ll admit it; I procrastinated on this event.  My divorce wasn’t final until March 8, and I basically didn’t do enough work on this event before that to make it a smooth project.  I think it came off well, but we were playing catch-up for the last month.  As the project manager, this was solely my fault; I even had several members on the team to act as designated “butt-kickers” for me.  I don’t think it would have changed the outcome much, but it would have been less stressful.

Building a better event guide.

As most of you know, the event guide is the key to a good SQLSaturday.  I didn’t deviate much from my previous event guide formulas (schedule on the front page, summary of speakers bios and sessions on the following pages, sponsor logo throughout).  In hindsight, there are some things I should have done.

• Jen recommended that we have a map of the rooms; we did.  It was on the last page of the guide.  I should have made it MUCH more obvious because we were dealing with several tracks.
• We (I) decided not to have a keynote session; we were expecting more people than we had room to hold in our largest conference space.  I should have taken the time to write out what to expect and where to go.  I answered a lot of basic questions over and over again on the day of the event (what do we do with raffle tickets, where are the extra restrooms, etc.).
• I’m not sure if the speaker bio is as relevant to the session attendance as we think; it may be better to have either a separate speaker book OR simply recommend that speakers do their own bios as part of the session.  We could have trimmed the book down quite a bit.  

How many people are we talking about?

I completely underestimated the response from attendees, speakers, and sponsors.  SQLSaturday has been around long enough that I think everyone is on board these days, and we definitely did not lack anything in terms of attendee registrations, speakers, and sponsors.  Our biggest challenge was space; I chose to reuse the Microsoft facility in Alpharetta because a) it’s nice, and relatively close to a tech hub in Atlanta, and b) it was free (Microsoft was a Gold sponsor).  Again, not a bad decision, but a decision that had consequences; we could only have 250 attendees in the rooms AND we needed to enforce room counts.

Before the event began, we had 250 people on the registration list and almost 100 people on the waiting list at one point.  We did this with minimal advertisement, and I think we could have easily hit 500 registered people if we had done more advertisement.  What really surprised me was the number of sponsors that responded as well as the number of speakers that submitted.  I made the not-so-smart decision to accept most submissions from speakers (I had a few complain about that; suck it up, Kendal); this meant that many submitters were presenting multiple times, and I was trying to evenly distribute 250 people across 7 tracks.  To keep the session count high, I decided to add an extra hour to the day (start early, end late).   7 sessions is too many, so next year I’m going to have say NO to more sessions by speakers.  However, I still want to encourage new speakers to apply as well as the more established circuit riders; I love Robert Cain and Kevin G. Boles (and they draw crowds), but I still want to hear from Audrey Hammonds and Julie Smith.

Sponsor participation was amazing (we had 14 sponsors; 6 of them a type of Gold), but I have bad news for my sponsors for next year; if we’re going to have to pay for space, our price levels are going to have to go up.  We’ll make it reasonable, but I may have to introduce a Platinum level for larger sponsors.  The good news is that while the overall cost will go up, we’ll be able to deliver a larger list of attendees to them and a broader reach.  In keeping with the comment above about getting started sooner, I plan to talk to a few of my regular sponsors and get their feeling on what was reasonable and what is fair.

The T-shirt.

I had chosen in the past to NOT do an event T-shirt, and Aaron Nelson (one of our committee members) talked me into doing one this time.  My past arguments about the shirt included a) I didn’t want to deal with sizes, and b) most people would wear the shirt for 1 time and then it would become a gardening or paint shirt.  We couldn’t do anything about sizes, but Aaron and I talked about a couple of different options for the shirt so that it wouldn’t be a typical wear-it-once kind of a thing.  We decided to come up with a geek-friendly saying on the front, and a simple advertisement for the event and the local user group (AtlantaMDF).  Here’s one of our happy raffle winners at the end of the day wearing the shirt!

Did it work?  Dunno; by the end of the day, all of the extra shirts were gone, and that’s unusual for an event of this type.  I had a lot of people asking me if they could grab one for a co-worker, or a youth group, and even a math class.  For all I know, there’s a family of four out in Dunwoody somewhere doing yardwork in the shirt we designed, but I hope that a least a few of my fellow data geeks will wear them in public or at work and advertise the next SQLSaturday (and AtlantaMDF and PASS). 

The Raffle Tickets for In-Session Drawing.

To me, this was one of the best ideas we had for SQLSaturday, and I am definitely going to keep doing it in the future.  We decided this year that we were going to do in-session drawings for swag in order to keep the final session as short as possible (all we had to do at the end of the day was draw tickets from our big sponsors).   After a lot of debate on how to do this, we finally decided that we would do the following:

1. Hand each session attendee a raffle ticket and a speaker evaluation form.  The attendee would fill out the speaker eval form, and use the ticket number instead of a name on the form.
2. The speakers would draw for prizes from the speaker eval forms, calling out the ticket number for a winner.

The benefits?  Fast drawings for prizes, session feedback was confidential, and the speakers got immediate feedback (no tallying necessary).   There were some challenges; attendees got confused by the word name on the speaker form, and were unsure what to write.  Next year?  Do it more like a claim check, with the number already assigned to the individual eval form.  I may have to spend a little money on perforated paper, but it should make it go easier.

Day Of The Event

Obviously, there were things we could have done on the day of the event better; we get a little better each year, but there’s always stuff to improve.

Registration

Our registration staff was AMAZING; unfortunately, there wasn’t enough of them.  We should have had more than two lines, particularly since we were expecting 250 people + wait list to show up before 8:30 AM.    A good formula is probably 100 people per line, with at least 2 hours of registration time.  The good news is that our head registrant (Lorra Newton) is thinking about writing an app to help speed up registration next time; we’ll discuss next time.

Sponsor Pit

We had to stuff sponsors into a relatively small area this year in order to make sure they had power; I know that it may have been an inconvenience, but I think it actually helped facilitate conversations.  The small space made the sponsor pit look busy, and busy places draw a crowd.

Better Training For Volunteers

Volunteer participation this year was amazing, and we did a better job than last year of pre-organizing the volunteers.  I still think we could do better, and we may need to see about making pre-con meetings mandatory for volunteers in exchange for greater rewards (a custom t-shirt, free lunch, something).  We were training people on the morning of the event, and there were a few mix-ups (like the aforementioned speaker eval/raffle claim check).

Lunch Tickets

Like the last two events, we charged a lunch fee in order to keep attendance high; when people pay for an event, they tend to show up, even if the event has only a nominal fee.  Unfortunately, we don’t do enough to distinguish between the fee for the event (FREE) and the fee for lunch.  I think next year, we’ll need to do lunch claim tickets to allow people to not pay for lunch and still come (bring their own or pay at the door).   Of course,  we’ve used non-payment of lunch fees in the past to help clean up the list before the event, and we’re not doing that anymore; we do, however, need to find ways of verifying that people will come, particularly if we have space limitations.

Session Scheduling

I need to be more sensitive to back-to-back scheduling for speakers; if I’m going to have them go back-to-back, then I need to put them in the same room.  Speaker schedules are always a bear; no matter what you do, you’re never going to get it perfect.  I think having a tighter schedule will help, but I still need to get better.  We did do a pre-conference survey to determine space requirements (large classes vs small classes), and that helped immensely, but I forgot to check for a balance of advanced, beginner, and intermediate classes during each hour of the day (the last hour of the day I had 1 advanced session, and the rest were all beginners; we had a bit of crowding at that point).

Post Con Activities

No doubt about it, I need to set realistic goals for wrapping up the event.  I still haven’t sent out sponsor emails, and I’m just now finishing the writeup.  I should have delegated some of these activities to volunteers, but simply didn’t.  That’s definitely on the list for next year.

There’s also more work to do, but I’ll save it for another post; I need to compile a list of blogs and photos from the event.  Hopefully that will come out in the next few days.

I know many people have been worried about me because of the recent personal issues that I’ve been dealing with, but things have finally started to stabilize.  I know I’ve promised that before, so no promises to return to blogging or getting more involved in the community, but I’m starting to climb out of the pit (and hey, I have light bulbs)!

Anyway, despite me, SQLSaturday 41 on April 24, 2010 is plugging along, thanks to a group of dedicated volunteers that have really pushed me to keep this on track.  Thankfully, I’ve been able to give them the information they need, and they’re quite capable of making this happen.  We’re a little more than a month out, and we’re almost full with our speaker’s list, and are sitting at nearly 60% registration.  Seats ARE filling up, so if you haven’t registered, now’s the time to do so.

Here’s a short list of topics so far (in no particular order):

A Lap Around SQL Server 2008 Master Data Services
Whitney Weaver
Beginner

Advanced Parameters in SQL Server Reporting Servic
Mike Davis
Intermediate

Can you control your reports?
Ryan Duclos
Intermediate

Common Table Expressions
Ryan Duclos
Beginner

Data Warehouse Assessments – What,Why, and How
Noah Subrin
Beginner

Database Design Fundamentals
Louis Davidson
Intermediate

Database Design Patterns
Louis Davidson
Intermediate

De-mystifying Execution Plan Analysis
Dave Turpin
Intermediate

Dynamically Configuring Packages
Mike Davis
Intermediate

Full Text Searching – A Guide for DBAs & Devs
Robert Cain
Beginner

Introduction to Data Warehousing / BI
Robert Cain
Beginner

Introduction to Performance Tuning
Mike Femenella
Beginner

Introduction to Performance Tuning
Mike Femenella
Beginner

Introduction to Transactional Replication
Troy Gallant
Beginner

Loading Data In Real Time
Mike Femenella
Intermediate

Off and Running with PowerPivot for Excel 2010
Robert Cain
Beginner

PowerShell for the Data Professional
Aaron Nelson
Intermediate

RESTful Data
Chris Eargle
Beginner

Slowly Changing Dimensions–Done Well.
Julie Smith
Beginner

Solving Real World Problems With DMVs
Whitney Weaver
Intermediate

SQL Server 2008 R2 Overview – Session 1
David Rodriguez
Beginner

SQL Server 2008 R2- BI Drill Down Session 2
David Rodriguez
Beginner

SQL Server 2008 R2- DBA Drill Down Session 3
David Rodriguez
Beginner

SS2008 Data Mining with Excel 2010 and PowerPivot
Mark Tabladillo
Intermediate

Survey of Windows Azure Platform Storage Options
Glen Gordon
Intermediate

The Art and Science of Data Modeling
Audrey Hammonds
Beginner

Tuna Helper for SQL Server DBA’s
Janis Griffin
Intermediate

Using Event Handlers in SSIS for Auditing and Noti
Mike Davis
Intermediate

Virtualize This!
Aaron Nelson
Beginner

Wait-Time Based SQL Server Performance Management
Janis Griffin
Intermediate

When GEO meets SQL: Hotwiring Data to Locations
Michael Clifford
Beginner

It’s live; we’re limited to 250 seats, so register now for a great day of training in Atlanta on April 24.  We’re also looking for speakers and sponsors, so please feel free to spread the word.  I’ll continue working on the stub in order to finish the site out, so check back often.

This will be a new challenge for me, since we’re planning on running this by committee (which has both benefits and challenges); I’ll keep you posted as to how that’s working out.

Stay tuned!

We’re looking at April 24 at the Microsoft facility in Alpharetta, GA.  I just submitted the request on the website tonight, so it probably won’t be official for a few days, but I a) needed something to blog about tonight, and b) wanted to get the word out to start some buzz.

Like last year, there will be a waiting list; we’re limited on space, and it will probably book quickly, so keep an eye out on this website for the official announcement.  We’re hoping to have several tracks again, as well as a mixture of experienced speakers and newcomers.

Watch and wait 🙂

I’m writing this post quickly, because I have a 6:30 SQLSaturday alumni meeting at a local donut stop.  Please don’t let the brevity of the post throw you off; lots of goals accomplished yesterday.  Unfortunately, going to sessions was not one of them 🙂

• I spent a lot of time networking, and discussing Agile techniques for database developers with a lot of different people, as well as looking at some of the latest and greatest tools for SQL Server.
• Speaking of vendors, I shipped home two huge boxes of free stuff, most of it from Quest, Idera, and Red Gate.  My shipping costs were $80, so you can imagine the stuff I had.
• Finally, and I’ll probably return to this in a later post, I met with the Board of Directors of PASS in an intimate session on governance.  It was fascinating, and I’m surprised that more chapter leaders were not there, because we discussed A LOT of issues related to the local chapters, and how PASS runs itself.  I don’t think that any particular goals were met, but I do believe that the following is true:
• Change is coming for the local chapters; the PASS board is going to try to do more to connect with the local chapter, but will want more from the local chapter as well.  Think of it as having more concrete discussions about how the local community uses SQL Server, and what niche can PASS fill.
• Steve Jones asked a series of great questions, including: “What have you done for me?”  He wanted the Board to be able to be more transparent, and expose their accomplishments beyond their individual audiences (for example, Greg Low’s work with the chapters should be available to those who are not chapter leaders).
• More to come.
• The day finally wrapped with an afterparty at a local arcade, hosted by Microsoft.  Lots of fun, but I was exhausted.

Gotta run; day 3 will be a blast.

Another SQLSaturday down!  This was my second one to organize in a year, and it was much different than the first event we held in April.  I learned a lot this time about managing the event, so it’s time for another wrap-up post 🙂  (YAY! You know you’re excited!).

Before I go to far, I need to express a huge THANK YOU to the faculty and students at Gainesville State College and the Institute for Environmental and Spatial Analysis, particularly Allison Ainsworth (and yes, we’re related).  I’ll explain more about their role in a bit, but they really made the event flow flawlessly and their presence helped make this event a huge success in a number of ways.  I’d also like to thank my daughter Isabel, who (like a typical twelve-year-old) alternated between being bored and excited about being there.  She was constantly in motion throughout the event, and she made me very proud.

I also want to thank our sponsors: Interworks and RedGate, as well as our hosting user group AtlantaMDF.  Without their involvement, there would be no SQL Saturday, and I hope that we can continue this tradition in our area for a long, long time.

Basic stats

• 103 registered; 75 attendees
• 12 faculty and student workers
• 3 tracks; 14 speakers

What worked well…

• Faculty & Student Volunteers rocked.  Having someone running the show who did not have a vested interested in seeing the speakers was a great asset; if you can partner with a local school and work out a deal to have student workers, DO IT!.  The team at GSC worked very hard, and while they managed to sneak in a few sessions, they didn’t expect to see all of them.  This was very different from the Alpharetta event earlier in the year where I felt guilty because several volunteers were unable to attend sessions.
• Attendee Volunteers were awesome.  I had several attendees who were very willing to proctor the sessions they were in (thus relieving the student workers of that responsibility).  They handled speaker time, took care of announcements, and made sure that the sessions flowed smoothly from one to the next.
• Lunch!  Lunch was a bit of an accident, really; we had made arrangements with Sonny’s Bar-B-Q to provide the meal, but had neglected to follow up until right before the event.  We were expecting box lunches, but because of the timing, they provided us with a buffet.  This happy accident was actually OK, as our costs were lower, and the amount of food provided was enough to ensure that everyone was well-fed.  In general, everybody ate well (breakfast, lunch, and a snack).
• Speakers!  Just thumbing through the evaluation forms, I saw a lot of positive comments.  I also heard a lot from the attendees about how well the speakers did in general.  We had several first-time speakers at this event, and I think they handled themselves very well.
• Facility.  I had several attendees compliment me on the choice of the facility; even though GSC is a bit of a drive from downtown Atlanta, several people seemed to indicate that the spaciousness of the floor plan was worth the drive.

What needs improvement…

• Sponsor recruitment.  We only had a couple of sponsors, and I wished I had managed to contact more.  Part of the difficulty was in approaching sponsors so soon after the Alpharetta event.  However, I did have a few attendees remark that they missed having the opportunity to meet with the sponsors.
• Prizes-for-evals.  In each session, we had attendees complete an evaluation form for a ticket; this way the form could be confidential, and they would have a chance to win a prize at the end of the day.  According to Allison, this was tough to manage (making sure that tickets and forms were collected at the end of each session).   I also think it biased the evals; since people HAD to complete one to get a ticket, many of them simply circled all #1’s or #4’s.
• Session oppositions.  I had a couple of situations where I wished I could have touted the GIS sessions more than I did; at the end of the day, for example, most of the SQL Server folks went to the open spaces sessions rather than the GIS session describing the program at GSC.  People have free choice, but I wish I could have found a way to encourage them to learn more about the hosting organization.
• Student presenters.  We had originally intended that there be a SQL Saturday #24 on Friday, featuring Student presenters.  It didn’t happen, so we need to figure out a way to open doors to students at GSC (and other schools).  We did have two presenters on Saturday, but I wish we had more.

What I would change next time…

• Speaker polos; student worker T-shirts.  We had speaker –t-shirts made up for the event, and we also shared them with most student volunteers.  I had a couple of speakers remark that they missed the polos (but they understood it was a budgeting issue).   It was nice, however, to see a sea of green t-shirts manning the registration desk, and helping attendees find their way.
• More vegetarian options.   No one went hungry; however, we had ordered vegetarian meals from a local Chinese restaurant for the attendees who had registered as vegetarians.  We had a few people who thought they had registered as a vegetarian, but it didn’t list that way on the extract from the site (my guess is they never actually clicked the button).  IF we do a buffet next year, we may do it as a Chinese buffet with additional vegetables.
• Bill the event as a North Atlanta or Lake Lanier event.  The space is great, and we’d love to make it a bigger event next year; however, we have to convince the Atlanta development community that it’s worth the drive, AND we have to figure out a way to get more sponsors involved.   IF we could get a well-known keynote (or special topic) speaker to appear, that could boost our attendance rate, and boost the sponsorship.
• Give away prizes during the last few minutes of a session.  Let’s do away with the prize-for-eval; still hand out eval forms, and tickets, but let the proctor in each session do the prize pull at the end of the session REGARDLESS of whether or not they have a completed form.  Hang on to all of the tickets for extra prizes at the end of the day.

Additional writeups:

A couple of blogs have already made it around the net; here’s a couple of different perspectives on the day.

http://dyfhid.blogspot.com/2009/10/sql-saturday-25-and-epiphany.html

http://ammonsonline.com/jeffablog/post/SQL-Saturday-25-Fun.aspx

http://arcanecode.com/2009/10/10/sql-saturday-25-gainesville-ga-october-10-2009/